Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 63 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but lower. Skoda Kodiaq is 7 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2035 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 295 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |