Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 107 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 735 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 1798 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover Velar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 65 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |