Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 11 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 845 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 1804 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 231 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |