Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Honda CR-V 2023

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2024 -
Honda CR-V
2023 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 204 HP148 HP
Torque: 320 NM189 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds9.4 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 56 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 131 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.06.7
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.70 m
Width: 1.86 m1.87 m
Height: 1.66 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 910 litres587 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2105 litres1642 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Kodiaq has 323 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 463 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3402`350
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv