Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Kodiaq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 16 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 16.30 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 910 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2105 litres | 1383 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 722 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |