Skoda Kodiaq 2024 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2035 litres | 1740 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Skoda Kodiaq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 1`953 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 38 400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |