Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Tesla Model Y 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 54 HP less power than Tesla Model Y, but torque is 10 NM more than Tesla Model Y. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | ||
| Range per fill-up: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 393 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Kodiaq) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Tesla Model Y) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is smaller, but higher. Skoda Kodiaq is 5 cm shorter than the Tesla Model Y, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1926 litres | |
| Skoda Kodiaq has 19 litres less trunk space than the Tesla Model Y. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.1 metres more than that of the Tesla Model Y. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`405 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`633 kg | 1`778 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 717 kg | 627 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Tesla Model Y. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Tesla Model Y has
| |