Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Ford Kuga 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq is 18 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1603 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 379 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 462 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`230 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`633 kg | 1`716 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 717 kg | 514 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |