Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2065 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 330 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 633 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |