Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Honda CR-V 2022
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Skoda Kodiaq) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Honda CR-V) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 55 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 213 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 14.40 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 1113 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 2166 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Skoda Kodiaq has 278 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |