Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 70 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Kodiaq and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 835 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space (by 285 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 720 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |