Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2021 - 2023
Mitsubishi Outlander
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.6 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.65.8
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1150 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.88 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Skoda Kodiaq is larger.
Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres128 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2065 litres1608 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Kodiaq has 707 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 457 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`410no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 29 40015 800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv