Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 37 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2065 litres | 1804 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Kodiaq has 80 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The Jaguar F-Pace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 600 | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
| |