Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs BMW X3 2021

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2021 - 2023
BMW X3
2021 - 2024
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP190 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.9 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.5
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1040 km in combined cycle
BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ...  More about BMW X3 2021 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.71 m
Width: 1.88 m1.90 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litres1600 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X3.
Gross weight: 2`410 kg2`500 kg
Net weight:1`690 kg1`840 kg
Load capacity:720 kg660 kg
Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 28 40043 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
BMW X3 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv