Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs BMW X3 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 10 HP more power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1580 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and BMW X3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 285 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 465 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`420 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 670 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 24 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
BMW X3 has
| |