Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Opel Grandland 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Kodiaq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Opel Grandland) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Grandland is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Grandland, but torque is 20 NM more than Opel Grandland. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 1.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 15.10 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 2680 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Grandland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Kodiaq is 22 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1528 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 445 litres more trunk space than the Opel Grandland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 537 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Grandland, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`409 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`652 kg | 1`801 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 757 kg | 569 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Opel Grandland. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |