Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Honda CR-V 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 148 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 97 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 587 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1642 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 248 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 423 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`373 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`719 kg | 1`806 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 654 kg | 544 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |