Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Honda CR-V 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Kodiaq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Honda CR-V) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 148 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 97 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 0.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 15.70 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 5750 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 617 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1710 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 218 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`373 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`719 kg | 1`916 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 654 kg | 514 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 39 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |