Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 95 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 835 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`373 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |