Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Ford Kuga 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 394 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 3 HP more power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 24 NM less than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.7 | |
| Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq is 18 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1653 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 379 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 412 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`373 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`719 kg | 1`702 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 654 kg | 548 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |