Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Renault Koleos 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Kodiaq) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Koleos) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.6 | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Koleos version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Renault Koleos 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Koleos 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1677 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 328 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`174 kg | 2`153 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 679 kg | 538 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |