Mitsubishi Outlander is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 34 HP less power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
4.8
5.3
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length.
Seats:
7 seats
5 seats
Trunk capacity:
270 litres
128 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:
270 litres
no data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:
no data
128 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible
2005 litres
1608 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 397 litres).
Turning diameter:
11.6 meters
10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
