Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2018
Mitsubishi Outlander
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 seconds10.2 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Skoda Kodiaq torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.0 l/100km
By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1220 km on highway1250 km on highway
880 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 188 mm (7.4 inches)190 mm (7.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.88 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Skoda Kodiaq is larger.
Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 560 litres128 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 560 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data128 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2005 litres1608 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 397 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`386 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 60015 800
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Outlander has
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv