Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.7
5.2
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 75 litres more fuel.
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.
Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.70 m
4.69 m
Width:
1.88 m
2.00 m
Height:
1.69 m
1.66 m
Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
650 litres
505 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litres
1432 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 145 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 633 litres).
Turning diameter:
11.6 meters
11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60.
