Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Renault Koleos 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 120 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 388 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`352 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`677 kg | 1`829 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 471 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |