Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Skoda Kodiaq torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1608 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`407 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |