BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 81 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 160 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later.
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.
BMW X3 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X3 2018 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.70 m
4.71 m
Width:
1.88 m
1.89 m
Height:
1.69 m
1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats:
7 seats
no data
Trunk capacity:
560 litres
550 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:
560 litres
no data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:
no data
550 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible
2005 litres
1600 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 405 litres).
Turning diameter:
11.6 meters
12 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
