Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
| Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1432 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 573 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |
