Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Renault Koleos 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Koleos version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Renault Koleos 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1677 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 328 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`639 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 681 kg | 565 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |