Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2018
Mitsubishi Outlander
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds11.6 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Skoda Kodiaq torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.05.8
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1150 km on highway
Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 188 mm (7.4 inches)190 mm (7.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.88 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Skoda Kodiaq is larger.
Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 560 litres128 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 560 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data128 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2005 litres1608 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 397 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`320 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 80016 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mitsubishi Outlander has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv