Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Jaguar I-Pace 2018

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.	Skoda Kodiaq 2018 - 2021	Jaguar I-Pace 2018 - 2023
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Diesel	Electric
Performance
Power:	177 HP	400 HP
Torque:	380 NM	696 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.6 seconds	4.8 seconds
	Jaguar I-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 223 HP less power than Jaguar I-Pace, whereas torque is 316 NM less than Jaguar I-Pace. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Consumption:		23.6 kWh/100km
Fuel tank capacity:	60 litres	90 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:	4.70 m	4.68 m
Width:	1.88 m	2.01 m
Height:	1.69 m	1.57 m
	Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar I-Pace, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	656 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	no data	1163 litres
Turning diameter:	11.6 meters	12.4 meters
	The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jaguar I-Pace, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	no data	2`670 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	19 800	19 000
Pros and Cons:	Skoda Kodiaq has better manoeuvrability	Jaguar I-Pace has more power more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Jaguar I-Pace 2018

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions