Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2015

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2018 - 2021
Chevrolet Captiva
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP184 HP
Torque: 380 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 secondsn/a seconds
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 7 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.67 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.69 m1.73 m
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but lower.
Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 4 cm lower.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data477 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1577 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight: no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 19 800no data
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • hydraulic power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv