Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Volvo V70 2007

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2018
Volvo V70
2007 - 2011
Body: Crossover / SUVEstate car / wagon
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP163 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds10.8 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo V70, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.6
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway1290 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 187 mm (7.4 inches)150 mm (5.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kodiaq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.82 m
Width: 1.88 m1.86 m
Height: 1.69 m1.54 m
Skoda Kodiaq is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 650 litres575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litresno data
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V70.
Gross weight: 2`361 kgno data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 8003800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Volvo V70 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv