Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs BMW X3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 41 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X3 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 560 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1600 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`476 kg | 2`435 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`723 kg | 1`765 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 753 kg | 670 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
BMW X3 has
| |