Skoda Kodiaq 2020 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1608 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 707 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 457 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`369 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |