Skoda Kodiaq 2020 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015

	Skoda Kodiaq 2020 - 2021	Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 - 2018
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Diesel	2.3 Diesel
Performance
Power:	200 HP	150 HP
Torque:	400 NM	360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.8 seconds	11.6 seconds
	Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	no data	5.8
Fuel tank capacity:	60 litres	60 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance:	192 mm (7.6 inches)	190 mm (7.5 inches)
Dimensions
Length:	4.70 m	4.70 m
Width:	1.88 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.69 m	1.68 m
	Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length.
Seats:	7 seats	5 seats
Trunk capacity:	270 litres	128 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:	270 litres	no data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:	no data	128 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	2005 litres	1608 litres
	The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 397 litres).
Turning diameter:	12.2 meters	10.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight:	no data	no data

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	19 800	16 000
Pros and Cons:	Skoda Kodiaq has more power more dynamic	Mitsubishi Outlander has better manoeuvrability lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Skoda Kodiaq 2020 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions