Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2017

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2018
Volvo XC60
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP249 HP
Torque: 320 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds6.8 seconds
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 69 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.37.2
Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway980 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)
Ground clearance: 188 mm (7.4 inches)216 mm (8.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.69 m
Width: 1.88 m2.00 m
Height: 1.69 m1.66 m
Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 560 litres505 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 560 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2005 litres1432 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 573 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight: 2`373 kg2`470 kg
Net weight:1`669 kg1`977 kg
Load capacity:704 kg493 kg
Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 80023 600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv