Skoda Kodiaq 2019 vs Renault Koleos 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 46 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.5 | |
|
The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 270 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2005 litres | 1690 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 315 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`671 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 739 kg | 540 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |