Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019

	Skoda Kodiaq 2018 - 2021	Mitsubishi Outlander 2019 - 2021
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	220 HP	150 HP
Torque:	350 NM	195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.5 seconds	13.3 seconds
	Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 70 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.0	8.7
	The Skoda Kodiaq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Skoda Kodiaq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	60 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	770 km in combined cycle	680 km in combined cycle
	Skoda Kodiaq gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:	4.63 m	4.70 m
Width:	1.88 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.69 m	1.71 m
	Skoda Kodiaq is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 8 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm lower.
Seats:	5 seats	7 seats
Trunk capacity:	463 litres	519 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:	no data	519 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:	463 litres	no data
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	1607 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	no data	10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg):	no data	no data

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	19 800	19 600
Pros and Cons:	Skoda Kodiaq has more power more dynamic lower fuel consumption more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions