Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs BMW X3 2017

	Skoda Kodiaq 2018 - 2021	BMW X3 2017 - 2021
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	220 HP	252 HP
Torque:	350 NM	350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	7.5 seconds	6.3 seconds
	BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 32 HP less power than BMW X3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.0	no data
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	65 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X3 2017 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:	4.63 m	4.71 m
Width:	1.88 m	1.89 m
Height:	1.69 m	1.68 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	463 litres	550 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible	1607 litres	1600 litres
	Skoda Kodiaq has 87 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 7 litres).
Turning diameter:	no data	12 meters
Gross weight:	no data	2`385 kg

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	19 800	25 400
Pros and Cons:	Skoda Kodiaq has lower price	BMW X3 has more power more dynamic roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs BMW X3 2017

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions