Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Renault Koleos 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 65 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 725 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1960 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 195 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`421 kg | 2`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`805 kg | 1`829 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 616 kg | 471 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |