Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 90 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 725 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1960 litres | 1608 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 597 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 352 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`421 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |