Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 50 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
6.4
5.2
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 180 litres more fuel.
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.
Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine
Dimensions
Length:
4.70 m
4.69 m
Width:
1.88 m
2.00 m
Height:
1.69 m
1.66 m
Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm higher.
Seats:
7 seats
no data
Trunk capacity:
230 litres
505 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats:
230 litres
no data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats:
no data
505 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down
1950 litres
1432 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 518 litres).
Turning diameter:
12.2 meters
11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
