Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 50 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine: The Volvo D4204T14 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder diesel from the VEA engine family, equipped with a twin-turbo setup and producing around 190 hp. It is a modern and efficient engine designed for good fuel economy and strong performance. When properly maintained, it can reach roughly ... More about Volvo XC60 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 230 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1432 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 518 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`529 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |