Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 63 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Kodiaq and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 230 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space (by 95 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`529 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`838 kg | 1`680 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 691 kg | 670 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |