Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 110 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Kodiaq and Nissan X-Trail are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 230 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1877 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`529 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |