Skoda Kodiaq 2018 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kodiaq engine produces 90 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Skoda Kodiaq reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The Hyundai Santa FE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Kodiaq could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kodiaq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Hyundai Santa FE are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 230 litres | 516 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 230 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 516 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | 1615 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 335 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`529 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`838 kg | 1`939 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 691 kg | 571 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Hyundai Santa FE. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |