Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Honda CR-V 2022

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2021 - 2023
Honda CR-V
2022 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Skoda Kodiaq is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Honda CR-V is available only with automatic gearbox.
Engines: 1.5 - 2.01.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 245 HP145 - 190 HP
Torque: 250 - 400 NM183 - 243 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 9.8 seconds9 - 9.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 8.60.8 - 7.1
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 192 mm (7.6 inches)153 - 208 mm (6 - 8.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kodiaq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.88 m1.87 m
Height: 1.69 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Honda CR-V are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres1113 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litres2166 litres
Honda CR-V has more luggage space.
Skoda Kodiaq has 278 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V.
Gross weight: ~ 2`347 kg~ 2`325 kg
Net weight:~ 1`633 kg~ 1`759 kg
Load capacity:~ 714 kg~ 566 kg
Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 29 000no data
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • both manual and automatic
  • higher ground clearance
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Honda CR-V has
  • automatic transmission only
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv