Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 245 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.8 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| In general, Skoda Kodiaq are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Kuga. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger. Skoda Kodiaq is 18 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1653 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 379 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 412 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.1 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`347 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`633 kg | ~ 1`670 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 714 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |