Skoda Kodiaq 2021 vs Dacia Duster 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Dacia Duster is available also with LPG engines. LPG engines generally provide lower running costs and cleaner emissions compared to petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 245 HP | 85 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 400 NM | 160 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.8 seconds | 9.7 - 14.8 seconds | |
| In general, Skoda Kodiaq are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Dacia Duster. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 4.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dacia Duster. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | 214 - 217 mm (8.4 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Kodiaq is 36 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1504 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 364 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 561 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.5 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`347 kg | ~ 1`810 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`633 kg | ~ 1`317 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 714 kg | ~ 493 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Dacia Duster. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 000 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |