Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2017

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2021
Volvo XC60
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid)
Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo XC60 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types.

Performance

Power: 116 - 240 HP150 - 320 HP
Torque: 200 - 500 NM300 - 480 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11.9 seconds5.3 - 10.2 seconds
In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Kodiaq. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 8.02.0 - 7.7
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 187 - 197 mm (7.4 - 7.8 inches)216 - 400 mm (8.5 - 15.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.69 m
Width: 1.88 m1.92 m
Height: 1.69 m1.66 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litres1432 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Kodiaq has 330 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 633 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60.
Gross weight: ~ 2`313 kg~ 2`507 kg
Net weight:~ 1`641 kg~ 2`007 kg
Load capacity:~ 672 kg~ 500 kg
Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 80023 600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volvo XC60 has
  • petrol, diesel and hybrid engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv